Maria Theodoraki’s Here en Route | JTP10 | 14.10 – 7.11.2010

October 20th, 2010

or-bits.com presents Maria Theodoraki’s Here en Route at JT Gallery.

By continuing its exploration of presenting works in translation, or-bits.com has invited Maria Theodoraki to present her online work here at JT Gallery during the exhibition JTP10.
Moving from the online to the offline, Theodoraki’s work aims to reconcile the limitless and elusive distance between the virtual and the physical with that of the route between her house and the gallery. By starting from a reflection on the physical distance between her coupled postcards, Theodoraki’s project confronts the ‘from A to B’. Is a mappable distance, and a suggested trajectory, a place? Or an extension of here?

Theodoraki’s Here en Route is a live time-based project that will develop during the 25 days of JTP10 exhibition.
Here en Route will be evolving both in the gallery and the outside, generating a here which will encompass two spaces (the exhibition and the urban space), two audiences (the gallery visitors and the inhabitants along Theodoraki’s route), as well as two distinct, yet related, routes and ways of connection between the artist and her public.

Theodoraki will be working every day, for two hours, at her desk in the gallery space till the end of JTP10.

On the 7th November, your are cordially invited to a closing event at the gallery, where from 4 to 6 pm, Theodoraki will be guiding you through Here en Route and the responses gathered from the people she will have met during the 25 days of the project.

images courtesy Guy Archard

//opening and closing events//

images courtesy Efi Paleologou

||||||||||||||||||||

Notes on Here en Route by Marialaura Ghidini.

Any ‘from A to B’ suggests a route between two set points in space. In the case of Theodoraki’s project the route has been determined by Google maps, which suggested the itinerary from her house to JTG gallery. Here en Route is a complex journey from an A to a B; in fact, it does not focus on the start and end points of a journey, nor just on the route, but on the way in which the As and Bs will be brought together through encounter.

“They sit comfortably one next to the other, they somehow connect, they click”; this is what Theodoraki tells me about the postcards she paired in her work here, made for or-bits.com in 2009.

here, from which Here en Route stems from, is a work also about journeying. It depicts fragments of routes in sequence, and offers to the viewer excursions into what is a series of seemingly fictionalised landscape views; and yet, these journeys are not simply movements from a point to the other, they are voyages into Theodoraki’s view point.
here toys with the notion of the nearness in space and time; and generates an allegory of proximity, which is what is given to the viewer by the artist. Here en Route operates in a similar way by somehow reverting to the origin of the artistic process of the artist herself. Although it is still the artist’s gaze which guides the audience into her ‘in-between A and B’, it is also the sought encounter with the same audience that, conversely, will be connecting Theodoraki with her itinerary.

Both here and Here en Route incorporate allegory and symbolism.
In The allegorical impulse: Toward a Theory of Postmodernism (October, 13 – 1980), Craig Owens discusses the urge to allegory in contemporary artistic practice of that time, and also examines its mechanism. Owens observes that the model for allegorical work is the palimpsest, in which “one text is read through another, however fragmentary, intermittent, or chaotic they relationship might be”.
Allegory adds a meaning to something already existing – while straightaway merging with it – and generates “an object, a place or an area that reflects its history”, like – as Owens writes – a palimpsest.

Theodoraki’s work encompasses allegories addressed to the eye, extending the meaning of what she uses in her investigations; and thus layering series of narratives on top of each other.
In Here 1, Here 2, Here 3 generic postcards views are transposed into a timeless state and become a representation of places as – I am drawn to think – they might exist in the mind of the artist. The network of Theodoraki’s views, which refers to sources in absence, generates a new unified mental (and visual) landscape since the artist proposes her own strategy of decodification; her own connecting points.
Here en Route is a spatiotemporal development of this previous work that, through employing a two-fold narrative element, brings the fragmentary relation between outwardly distant spaces (which are the theres as seen by the other) into the here of the artist, and vice-versa.

Theodoraki’s almost ritualistic presence in her work unifies a complex web of trajectories beyond that which is explicit to the eye, or shown on a computer-generated map.

||||||||||||||||||||

or-bits.com presents Maria Theodoraki’s Here en Route | JTP10, JT Gallery

October 10th, 2010

14 OCTOBER – 7 NOVEMBER 2010

or-bits.com presents Maria Theodoraki’s Here en Route during JTP10.
At JT Gallery, Hackney London, UK

PV 15 OCTOBER 2010, 6-10 pm
Open , Thu –

buy sildenafil

Sun 12-6 pm
Closing event 7 NOVEMBER 2010, 4-6 pm


JTP10 brings together nine diverse independent initiatives: Antepress, Basement Arts Projects, Call and Response, Five Storey Projects, Gesamtkunstwerk, JTG, no.w.here, or-bits.com, SHIFT. Gallery
For more info, go to JPT10 page.

[event documentation]

zp8497586rq

Exposed: Voyeurism, Surveillance and the Camera

October 2nd, 2010

It’s the final weekend of Tate Modern’s s exhibition on looking. From the Tate website:

Exposed offers a fascinating look at pictures made on the sly, without the explicit permission of the people depicted. With photographs from the late nineteenth century to present day, the pictures present a shocking, illuminating and witty perspective on iconic and taboo subjects.”

If you cannot make it to the exhibition this weekend here’s a video about the show from the Tate Channel:

Sandra Phillips on Surveillance; Exposed, Tate Channel, 2010

Photopathologies

September 26th, 2010

We’re living in the hope and the risk that our gaze might one day have captured everything, leaving nothing uncaught, nothing unnamed, nothing unaccounted for. If we were to reach this point of total saturation, then what? Completion, annihilation, silence?

The thrill of the gaze is also its threat: that looking might wholly incorporate, alter and deplete the object of our regard to the point that what we see is no longer the thing in itself but the pale trace of its absence. Such is also the thrill and threat of language: the intimate taste of the thing's name in our mouth persuades us we are holding the thing up close when we are holding only its name – a name, moreover, that provokes the thing itself to recede into the distance in its move to evade our regard. (If you can get behind the paywalls, Pinheiro Machado’s Nothingness and the Work of Art and Schwenger’s Words and the Murder of the Thing are compelling treatments of these ideas.)

Capturing a thing by its image rather than its name promises a more immediate means of total incorporation, particularly given the increasing ubiquity of the digital camera in the contemporary world. In his recent essay Photopathologies, Anton Viesel explores the prospect of absolutely replicating the earth through photography – extract below:

“Where now we see the Eiffel Tower appear on flickr only intermittently from a limited number of different perspectives each day – relying as we do on the imperfect and inefficient recording devices that individual tourists now constitute – we will after the final development of an infinite photography see it appear continually from every possible angle every moment of every day. What is more, the surfaces of the Eiffel Tower themselves will have been activated as a stream of tiny photographic machines, each of which records what passes before it. The visual data, collected from innumerable devices, will be fed into self-replicating storage machines that monitor their own surfaces and so the narcissistic turn will be complete.

The new photography, still only in embryo, is a form of creativity that is at heart anti-humanist. All specifically human intervention has been erased, whether conscious or unconscious, willed or automatic. Instead, the endpoint is the absolute replication of the world, the tautology of truth, things are as they are.”

Paper View

September 17th, 2010

The person at 298b has only a very small window offering almost no view at all: just the top of a brick wall and a few inches of sky. This is inadequate. At times he feels like staring into the plotless scrolling of people and things you get through proper windows, but there’s nothing to see. The view’s blank.

So at times like these he’s started building the view himself. He’s mainly been using paper: three dimensional models of trees and rooftops glued together, outlines of clouds stuck straight onto the glass, stick people below with shopping bags and kites and mates. Sometimes a paper church in the distance, sometimes a parade of shops trooping across the glass, sometimes lightning or fireworks in felt tip. He’s framed the view with a foreground of very detailed leaves of a larger scale and with veins pencilled on, some of them fixed to lengths of wire he frequently rearranges. There are occasionally paper birds on the wires.Sometimes he gets the leaves to rustle.

He’s been building the view for just over a year now, and it’s some months since the last scrap of natural light made it through the glass into the room. Building doesn’t always mean adding bits – he takes bits away too, rearranges bits, colours bits in, rubs bits out – but it’s never enough just to watch it, static, as he last left it. Since the model won’t change on its own like a real view, if he wants to stare into plotless narratives he has to make do with watching the operations of his own mind as they form before him in paper and glue and wire. His paper view is looking turned inside-out: sight that produces rather than absorbs, watching itself into being.